Downtime – and the response time to it – continues to plague manufacturers across the United States. A 2022 Siemens report revealed that a typical large plant “still loses 25 hours a month to unplanned downtime.” They estimate the cost of an hour of downtime to be $500,000 for oil and gas companies, which makes downtime quickly cost millions.
As a result, teams are responding by gathering internal technical requirements, evaluating off-the-shelf machine monitoring solutions and attempting trial implementations. Top machine monitoring solutions will capture data from new and aged CNC equipment and deliver trends and reports using configurable dashboards via modern communication tools, like text and Microsoft Teams, to help you pinpoint production bottlenecks and machine condition degradation for improved Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), quality control and profitability.
But there are hundreds of available equipment monitoring software solutions today, ranging from Predator Software to Scytec DataXchange and beyond, and the equipment monitoring market itself is projected to reach 220.92 million USD by 2031. This makes the vendor decision-making process all the more onerous and lengthier, particularly for time and labor-constrained companies. Some manufacturers are instead taking on a Do-It-Yourself (DIY) approach by assembling internal and/or outsourced developers, collaborating with various departments and rolling out a custom solution. There’s an attraction to this path, but is it truly the right way toward achieving more uptime, better operator performance and greater profits?
If you’re considering or already headed in this direction, you very well may consider the positive and negative aspects of DIY equipment monitoring development to fully validate your decision. As a manufacturing integrator experienced in helping manufacturers search, select and implement the ideal machine monitoring software solution for your business, the experts at Shop Floor Automations have compiled a comprehensive list to aid your research below. We welcome your comments on other advantages and disadvantages that factor into your own machine monitoring evaluation.
The Pros of DIY Equipment Monitoring Software Development
- Potentially less upfront cost. When your teams develop equipment monitoring software in-house, you’re not likely to incur the recurring software subscription or license fees demanded by software vendors. Software subscription revenues are anticipated to grow by a CAGR of 16.6% reports EY, as enterprise technology companies continue to shift away from a perpetual software license model. You also have the benefit of leveraging existing programmable logic controllers (PLCs) without upfront costs for hardware and training to program it.
- Built your way. Machine monitoring software designed for your business can be customized to accommodate your specific business processes, equipment types, locations, unique terminology and standards, integrations and more. You’re not forced to adapt to the user interface, limitations and future development of a commercial application geared for a mass of users.
- Vendor neutral. A DIY equipment monitoring project allows you to be in control, deciding who is involved and how the system and data is maintained, supported, secured and located. Conversely, a machine monitoring software provider will often dictate the supporting partners and underlying ecosystem available with the solution – which can require data hosted by their third-party provider.
- Fringe benefits of familiarity. When you’re able to dedicate your resources to your own project, you can command your own timetable, training program and the coordination of subject matter experts. There’s less of an educational barrier, too, as teams should be familiar with the corporate nomenclature, key personnel and strategic priorities. The purchase of a commercial application like equipment monitoring software, however, means you are beholden to the skills, bandwidth, language and processes of the technology provider and the demands of their existing customer base.
The Cons of DIY Equipment Monitoring Software Development
- Susceptibility to higher Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and other impacts. The TCO of your DIY equipment monitoring system goes beyond just IT salaries; often the continued energy costs, hardware, security, training, networking, backup, testing and more will make this project far more expensive than commercial applications. Your custom software would also likely be impacted significantly by change: budgetary constraints, shifts in strategic objectives and corporate systems and policies, personnel movements and other factors. As a dedicated technology business to many users, the commercial developer tends to better absorb and rebound from events like employee attrition and economic impacts.
Less emphasis on contingency and continuity. As an internal project, DIY machine monitoring software can be more prone to decreased attention over time, particularly if the project champion has left for another opportunity or moved to another department. The software and its related documentation and training programs, then, are less likely to stay current or remain relevant as new technology and security protocols are introduced to the business, new machinery is acquired and older machinery is retired or networks are upgraded. In this age of rapid change, software that sits doesn’t help a bit.
- Forfeiting best practices. Custom software, such as DIY machine monitoring, inherently lacks the benefits that come from applying industry best practices, including data trends across wide swaths of users and equipment types, new AI developments, the latest security standards and other technological advancements that require research, resources and large, varied datasets. The core competency of software vendors often affords them greater focus, expertise, budgets, data access and more to help customers refine their business processes through proven functionality.
- Shouldering the burden of ongoing maintenance and improvements. New requests for features require manual updates to hardware when working with DIY machine monitoring software. Maintenance technicians, for example, have to update the PLC hardware to capture each additional signal desired by internal management. This step may need to be replicated for each machine tool, which can be time-consuming and requires additional documentation to capture every change. Commercial machine monitoring, on the other hand, enables configuration via a web browser without the need to physically walk to the equipment.
In this age of rapid change, software that sits doesn’t help a bit.
Custom machine monitoring applications tend to be rigid in design, requiring a multitude of support tickets to increase flexibility as users engage with the software over months and years. Commercial equipment monitoring solution providers, alternatively, configure the System Resource Controller (SRC) and deploy changes easily. Their solutions tend to be out-of-the-box configurable for user control of reports, charts, and dashboards based on your machine brands. Software developers also have streamlined processes in place to accommodate continued development schedules and software enhancement and integration requests.
A DIY approach to equipment monitoring software can appear practical, especially for manufacturers with in-house IT development. But it’s important to look beyond upfront factors to include the entire scope of such a project, so that your TCO encompasses all opportunity costs, barriers necessary to overcome and anticipated internal and external changes that will impact short- and long-term development. After all, a deviation from core competency can be a costly mistake for manufacturers already reeling from downtime and production loss.